Corona and Falsissimo Removed from Social Media: What's Happening?
The tension between Mediaset e Fabricius Corona marks a concrete turning point. In the last few hours, several pieces of content attributable to the former photographic agent have been removed or obscured from the main social media platforms. At the center of the story is Very false, the format with which Corona fueled suspicions and controversial narratives about alleged "systems" linked to the television group. This situation marks an operational shift, after weeks of media outcry and harsh press releases.
What has been removed from social media and where
Currently Instagram It no longer shows traces of profiles attributable to Fabrizio Corona. Both the personal account and the one linked to Falsissimo are missing. Also on YouTube The situation appears to have changed: free content is blocked, while only paid content remains accessible. This distinction suggests selective intervention, targeting specific violations.
The removals come after reports were filed by the Mediaset legal pool, which has chosen to intervene directly on digital platforms. This is not an isolated action, but rather a utilization of the standard procedures established by social networks for the protection of rights.
Why platforms can remove content
From a technical point of view, the issue is less complex than it might seem. All the main social platforms provide tools for the reporting copyright infringementThrough dedicated forms, anyone who believes that content violates copyright can request its removal without necessarily having to resort to warnings or legal proceedings.
In this case, the copyright notices fit into a broader context. Mediaset has in fact declared its intention to combat content deemed harmful under various aspects, including: defamation, privacy, personal dignity e hate speechA complex legal framework that goes beyond the simple protection of copyright.
The connection with the decisions of the Court of Milan
The blackout of Falsissimo's content also appears consistent with previous judicial decisions. In particular, aprecautionary order of the Civil Court of Milan, issued in relation to the Signorini case, had already ordered Corona to cancel previous publications and hand over the material in his possession.
The removals on social media therefore seem to be part of a continuous trend, reinforcing the idea of a progressive reduction in the former photographic agent's digital presence.
The reaction of Fabrizio Corona's lawyer
The defense's response was not long in coming. Ivano ChiesaFabrizio Corona's lawyer, spoke of a real operation of obscurantism, defining it as a form of censorship and maintaining that the public opinion is aware of it.
A reading contested by those who observe the matter from a regulatory perspective. Rather than censorship, the blackout is interpreted as the application of copyright rules and platform policies, accepted by anyone who uses those channels to spread content.